Bishops and Bosses: Changing Trends in Church-State Relations in Boston
Tom O'Connor
Boston College, University Historian
¶Ł²¹³Ł±š:ĢżSeptember 9, 2003
Event Recap
Two dozen faculty and community members from across Boston crowded into the Boisi Centerās conference room on September 9th to hear the āDean of Boston historiansā Tom OāConnor share his thoughts in a presentation titled āBishops and Bosses: Changing Trends in Church- State Relations in Boston.ā OāConnor began by emphasizing the significance of the recent events that resulted in the highly publicized and scandal- ridden resignations of two Irish Catholic power brokers---Cardinal Bernard Law and William Bulger. OāConnor characterized the era in which these two men presided over political life in Boston as being marked by āseparation, secrecy and silence.ā Problems were handled behind closed doors, family loyalty was paramount, and there were high barriers of separation between the hierarchy and the clergy; the clergy and the laity; politicians and the electorate; and civilians and criminals.
Although OāConnorās view is that the resignation of these men marks the end of an era, audience members raised theories of their own during the discussion period suggesting that the erosion of Irish Catholic power had begun even earlier. One audience member, a former editor at theĀ Boston Globe, observed that significant changes were wrought in the power structure when theĀ Boston GlobeĀ was purchased by theĀ New York Times. This shift in ownership resulted in out of town editors being brought in who were more resistant to the ālate night calls from the chanceryā that he witnessed in an earlier era. Christopher Winship, from the Harvard sociology department, commented that the power balance also began shifting in the 1990ās when dot com money began to flow into Boston giving rise to a new kind of community leadership. There was also discussion about the role of non-Irish Catholic minority groups in Boston politics, the ethnic tribalism that seems to be a part of Bostonās character, and whether race and ethnicity still play as powerful a role in politics as they once did. True to historical form, OāConnor deferred a conclusive response to such predictions as a history yet to be written.